FastBird91
Registered User
Can we get a Turbo system and put it on a SuperCoupe with the supercharger left on of course...???
Conan56 said:Its too complicated to run both a turbo and A supercharger
I think the Supercharger would just end up causing a restriction
Conan56 said:Its too complicated to run both a turbo and A supercharger
I think the Supercharger would just end up causing a restriction
Yes, and all of those turbo kits are for N/A cars.FastBird91 said:.......nobody has invented a turbo? Come on now thats disturbing especially considering how many other cars you can get a turbo system for.
89SCK@t said:The M90 wouldnt hamper anything if you route the intake side of the turbo after the supercharger and before the return plenum.
Randy N Connie said:Food for thought.
Scott Long said:What about a pullied whipple fed to a front mount and the whipple was getting say 9 psi from a turbo? I prefer one or the other, or one form of forced induction plus a power adder (nitrous).
I would still think the M90 would be the bottle neck if you fed it with a turbo. But if you sized everything properly it might work decent. It would still be pretty expensive and I think the money could be spent elsewhere on other modifications that would prove more effective.
...Using a turbo like that to feed pressurized air to the supercharger would be the easiest way to retain the supercharger (for bottom end grunt) and have the turbocharger for mid and top end power. The M-90 will move all the air you could ever need if it was being feed with positive manifold pressure. The oulet tube from the turbo would connect to the MAF which would need to placed a little closer to the throttle body (to remove any sharp turns just before the MAF) and changed to a blow thru style...
...The turbo doesn't need to be real efficent, just good enough to maintain positive intake charge pressure in front of the supercharger.
David