nickleman60
Registered User
besides the different openings on the rear of the blower what else is different between the two blowers?
metalman said:Huh oh, nickleman. Are looking to get one of these too?
So guys, is the MPIII worth it?
XR7 Dave said:I've seen the MPIII pick up 25rwhp and lose 10ftlbs torque compared to a stock 1990 blower at the same drive ratio on an internally stock motor.
I've not seen it pick up anything over an MPII at drive ratio's of 15% or less on a modified motor.
metalman said:well, as you know they is an M112 design that is being developed by Blue Tongue. That's was I was refering to.
Thanks for the insight.
A couple people already have Pauls M112 kit.Toms-SC said:Keep waiting, its only been 2 years
metalman said:Why hasn't offered them up 'for sale', yet?
Forgive me if this was rude to post.BT Motorsports said:I will not be quoting any #s from customer's cars. All I will say is that the #s have been right on with my predicitions and both the customers and myself are very pleased with the results.
At some point in time, when I get my personal vehicle and/or the test mule on the rollers, I will likely add those charts to the web page. There has just been way to much slamming and arguing in various threads over the past year or two because of dyno #s, track performance or looks. After watching the AR vs. MP thread, I have better things to do with my time than go through that kind of mud which benefitted absolutely no one in this community.
Paul