Re: Vernon
I can understand why a "bogus" username would be banned, I understand entirely!
It seems that in this case not only did the "bogus" name get banned, but his IP address as well, not allowing the "real" user to partake of the SCCOA BBS. The "real" user in question wasn't the one that was banned, but because his address is attatched to the "bogus" name he too, was banned.
Let's face it, we can talk about getting along til we are blue in the "fingers" (LOL) but it will never happen.
All parties that have jumped in on these arguments are all guilty. In this case the original intent of the user in question may have just been a bad descision.
I understand why you did what you did George, but if the user in question mailed you, would you consider allowing he, or any others who may have taken there sense of humor a bit overboard to use the SCCOA BBS again knowing that people understand that it is a SCCOA policy NOT TO impersonate??
I support what you did, but we all know how aggravating some people can get and I think we all have tried different ways of getting through to people. Maybe this way was just a bad descision. I know I don't need to explain to you, I think you already know, my only question was if I made a mistake or perhaps I didn't exercise my descretion a little better, would I be held accountable forever?
Yeah, depends on the offense right??? LOL
I want to say, I don't speak for this individual, I have no affiliation with him, I was just curious to know that now that the deed is done, how does it get rectified?