This post shows pics of where mine is located.
http://www.sccoa.com/forums/showpost.php?p=445171&postcount=3
David
PS: Randy...I don't know if it's giving false readings or not.
I would not know either. I am also questioning to. I have done no testing
of snow system yet.
I would think this may be somthing that could be tested cheaply
with the introduction of food dye, mix with the fluild being injected.
Then take the IC tube off, then inspect for signs in the suspected
area of puddleing on and around sensor area.
This is why I polish the insides of all my performance induction
or intake paths inside my complete intake system on all motors during
developing parts. I can more easiler read the airs dye colored path.
This is the same type test I use & pro-head porters would use. To
test for fuel falling out of the air and puddeling taking place in ports,
and complete induction system.Its call wet flow testing.
This can be performed with during flow bench type testing.
And for ones that do not have a flow bench, for intake,not
iduction systems. It can also Sometimes be performed with
complete intake parts together, with motor running,
(next 4 carbs & injector path to port only)(with dye in the
fuel tank being used to power engine being tested...)
Are sc induction system would be to long for this test
,plus fuel injector placment. the dye would need to be introduce
before compressor and after compressor and Intercooler for
complete iduction system tests.
But testing a snow system could be easily done to read color
dye patterns for puddeling signs, with its injector placments.
Commin since tells me that two smaller injectors would do a better
job of getting the fluild to atomize in the air path. And keeping the fluild
from falling out of air, to cause puddeling. Since we are dealing with a
wide RPM range.
I would also think that a Bar style injector would be better suited
for use in certain areas over a nozzle injector in induction system.
To better atomize and keep fluild suspended.
I am out of here, later Randy