pro street rich
Registered User
OK so here goes...When is the SCCOA going to get going and rewrite the rules on ET slips and what is done with the car??
Here is my point, and you will have to agree with it... back in 2003 I posted a time slip for one of my passes with a V6 S.C. that was in the 11's. I further followed that up with one even faster in the 11's as well...To date they have never been posted??? WHY??? no clue, but the car did do it and still no postting on it..
This is not my complaint, rather just something that fits right into this whole thing of posting time slips...Those runs were made by a sc V6 BUT it was not a true 3.8 This was done with a 4.3 V6 that had a very short life span... Did anyone know this??? YES some of the guys on here knew that it was a strocker engine..now to the point that I am tring to get to..
There is common knowledge around here that some others have been working on strocker engines. There is also proof that some people have gotten "SPEICAL" blowers from Charles to try...There were a few MP 3's out there before anyone even knew that there was such a thing... Lets look at some of those manifolds that have been built, some are not even alumium, but has any of this EVER been talked about???
If you go back a few years you will come across some of the adds for some of this "odd ball" stuff being sold...There is no police work being done on anything that people are running AND CLAIMING that it is STOCK...
There are some people that will not show what is under their hood, nor show the video of a run to even get close to proving their claim to fame..Why is this put up with?? Why is it the same VERY VERY small group that get the extra fug room when it comes to proving their time or for that matter what they may or may not have done???
This is all coming to a head in light of all the stink that is coming out of Jims post on his run.. Did he go as fast as he claims?? My guess is that he did, BUT what did he do to get it to go that fast??? How big is this engine?? He was selling strocker cranks a while ago, his comment was, WE have something else up our sleeve...Bigger is better....is that what he was talking about??
I know this will get some talk going, some of it will be good, but there will be some that will turn bad in a New York minute,[no refrence to the guys who post from that part of the world} just a statement... What do you think?? is it not time for the SCCOA to start looking at the car that really did the pass down the track??? Are we still going to just take it for granted that what you post is the truth and not a gray side of the truth??? Lets please hear your responce, thanks in advance.....Rich
Here is my point, and you will have to agree with it... back in 2003 I posted a time slip for one of my passes with a V6 S.C. that was in the 11's. I further followed that up with one even faster in the 11's as well...To date they have never been posted??? WHY??? no clue, but the car did do it and still no postting on it..
This is not my complaint, rather just something that fits right into this whole thing of posting time slips...Those runs were made by a sc V6 BUT it was not a true 3.8 This was done with a 4.3 V6 that had a very short life span... Did anyone know this??? YES some of the guys on here knew that it was a strocker engine..now to the point that I am tring to get to..
There is common knowledge around here that some others have been working on strocker engines. There is also proof that some people have gotten "SPEICAL" blowers from Charles to try...There were a few MP 3's out there before anyone even knew that there was such a thing... Lets look at some of those manifolds that have been built, some are not even alumium, but has any of this EVER been talked about???
If you go back a few years you will come across some of the adds for some of this "odd ball" stuff being sold...There is no police work being done on anything that people are running AND CLAIMING that it is STOCK...
There are some people that will not show what is under their hood, nor show the video of a run to even get close to proving their claim to fame..Why is this put up with?? Why is it the same VERY VERY small group that get the extra fug room when it comes to proving their time or for that matter what they may or may not have done???
This is all coming to a head in light of all the stink that is coming out of Jims post on his run.. Did he go as fast as he claims?? My guess is that he did, BUT what did he do to get it to go that fast??? How big is this engine?? He was selling strocker cranks a while ago, his comment was, WE have something else up our sleeve...Bigger is better....is that what he was talking about??
I know this will get some talk going, some of it will be good, but there will be some that will turn bad in a New York minute,[no refrence to the guys who post from that part of the world} just a statement... What do you think?? is it not time for the SCCOA to start looking at the car that really did the pass down the track??? Are we still going to just take it for granted that what you post is the truth and not a gray side of the truth??? Lets please hear your responce, thanks in advance.....Rich