Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Vacuum Canister - Needed for vacuum brake swap?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Hamburg, PA
    Posts
    49

    Vacuum Canister - Needed for vacuum brake swap?

    Putting together a parts list and instruction for myself to do the vacuum brake swap on my 91 so I have brakes (pump is shot so I'm just saving money and doing the swap). What I learn from this will eventually lead me to knowing what I need to do when the system on my 92 inevitably starts to fail. I've read every post on this forum about the swap, and I'm using the baseline LX/5.0 parts for the same year because I'm not fond of two proportioning valves on the same line. One thing though that I've really only seen one discussion on is using a Vacuum Canister. Has anyone added one, or felt they should? How did you set it up? Can't think of a time where I'd be on the throttle and gas at the same time during some spirited driving or possible autocross now and then, so I'm thinking it may not be worth it.
    1992 SC - 5 Speed, Black, Stock
    1991 SC - Auto, Black, Currently Stock

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Daytona Beach, FL
    Posts
    176
    Quote Originally Posted by 92SCtk View Post
    Putting together a parts list and instruction for myself to do the vacuum brake swap on my 91 so I have brakes (pump is shot so I'm just saving money and doing the swap). What I learn from this will eventually lead me to knowing what I need to do when the system on my 92 inevitably starts to fail. I've read every post on this forum about the swap, and I'm using the baseline LX/5.0 parts for the same year because I'm not fond of two proportioning valves on the same line. One thing though that I've really only seen one discussion on is using a Vacuum Canister. Has anyone added one, or felt they should? How did you set it up? Can't think of a time where I'd be on the throttle and gas at the same time during some spirited driving or possible autocross now and then, so I'm thinking it may not be worth it.
    I don't have one in my system, but I feel like it may help during driving on the highway, abrupt stops, or when I'm using cruise control. I've maybe had a few instances in the past few months where I went to press the brake and there was a delay of a second or two before I got any stopping power. Also note that (at least in my system) the braking power is a little bit less right off the bat than it was with the ABS system. A vacuum canister might help with that too, but I can't say for myself.

    Have you looked into the Hydroboost system from Bosch? It's pricier than the Vacuum conversion, but I'm kind of wishing I did that instead of the vacuum conversion, just for the extra stopping power.

    Good Luck,
    Joseph

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Tinton Falls, NJ
    Posts
    1,488
    As long as the check valve on the line going into the vacuum booster is functioning properly, there is no need for a vacuum canister. If that check valve goes bad though, then every time you get into boost, it will pressurize the booster and cause it to take a few seconds of vacuum before you get power assist again.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Hamburg, PA
    Posts
    49
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMikeyL View Post
    As long as the check valve on the line going into the vacuum booster is functioning properly, there is no need for a vacuum canister. If that check valve goes bad though, then every time you get into boost, it will pressurize the booster and cause it to take a few seconds of vacuum before you get power assist again.
    The more I tried to break down the vacuum system in my head last night, you confirmed what I eventually concluded myself so thank you for your input. Appreciate it.
    1992 SC - 5 Speed, Black, Stock
    1991 SC - Auto, Black, Currently Stock

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Hamburg, PA
    Posts
    49
    Quote Originally Posted by Roboplex View Post
    I don't have one in my system, but I feel like it may help during driving on the highway, abrupt stops, or when I'm using cruise control. I've maybe had a few instances in the past few months where I went to press the brake and there was a delay of a second or two before I got any stopping power. Also note that (at least in my system) the braking power is a little bit less right off the bat than it was with the ABS system. A vacuum canister might help with that too, but I can't say for myself.

    Have you looked into the Hydroboost system from Bosch? It's pricier than the Vacuum conversion, but I'm kind of wishing I did that instead of the vacuum conversion, just for the extra stopping power.

    Good Luck,
    Joseph
    Thanks for your input on how your brakes feel. I've seen that same reaction a few times on here, but I think I'll be OK. Honestly, if I hadn't had my 92 as long as I have or bought a non-SC, I wouldn't know the difference.

    I have looked at the Hydroboost system, and I really would prefer it, if money wasn't a problem. I'm trying to allocate more of my funds to a paint job on my 92 at this point though.

    Thanks again!
    1992 SC - 5 Speed, Black, Stock
    1991 SC - Auto, Black, Currently Stock

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Greenville, IN
    Posts
    4,220
    I've done footbrake / gas burnouts at the track with mine without a problem for years.

    On the street, you definitely don't need to add a canister.

    I'd pull vacuum from a place that never sees boost if I were you though.
    Matt Haub
    Shootouts: '09 SS 1st | '10 Mod1 2nd | '11 Bracket 3rd | '12 Bracket 1st | 2013 | '14 Bracket 3rd | 2015 | '16 Bracket 1st & Mod2 2nd | 2017 |
    Black '89 5spd - 281K miles, MPx, E85, Alky-Inj RWHP: ? RWTQ: ? Best 1/4mi:12.521, MPH:107.23mph
    35th Anniversary Auto 46k miles | Red '93 Auto 186k miles
    My Garage

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Hamburg, PA
    Posts
    49
    Quote Originally Posted by DrFishbone View Post
    I've done footbrake / gas burnouts at the track with mine without a problem for years.

    On the street, you definitely don't need to add a canister.

    I'd pull vacuum from a place that never sees boost if I were you though.
    Great, thank you! I have it planned that I'm going to pull from the main line between the TB and the supercharger so I think I'll be good.
    1992 SC - 5 Speed, Black, Stock
    1991 SC - Auto, Black, Currently Stock

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Greenville, IN
    Posts
    4,220
    I don't have any good pictures of it, but I was able to connect to the vacuum tree over in the drivers corner of the engine bay....real short piece of hose....this tree pulls vacuum from inlet plenum, prior to the SC..... 😉
    Matt Haub
    Shootouts: '09 SS 1st | '10 Mod1 2nd | '11 Bracket 3rd | '12 Bracket 1st | 2013 | '14 Bracket 3rd | 2015 | '16 Bracket 1st & Mod2 2nd | 2017 |
    Black '89 5spd - 281K miles, MPx, E85, Alky-Inj RWHP: ? RWTQ: ? Best 1/4mi:12.521, MPH:107.23mph
    35th Anniversary Auto 46k miles | Red '93 Auto 186k miles
    My Garage

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Hamburg, PA
    Posts
    49
    Ah, OK. As many times as I've looked at the vacuum routing, that never even crossed my mind. That makes it cleaner too. Thank you for that.
    1992 SC - 5 Speed, Black, Stock
    1991 SC - Auto, Black, Currently Stock

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Hamburg, PA
    Posts
    49
    Quote Originally Posted by DrFishbone View Post
    I don't have any good pictures of it, but I was able to connect to the vacuum tree over in the drivers corner of the engine bay....real short piece of hose....this tree pulls vacuum from inlet plenum, prior to the SC..... 
    Would I be guessing correctly that you removed the line for the speed control vacuum, and routed the brake booster to that port on the tree? Having or not having cruise control is not really a concern for me, and that would be really simple/clean.
    1992 SC - 5 Speed, Black, Stock
    1991 SC - Auto, Black, Currently Stock

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Bossier City, LA
    Posts
    2,151
    Quote Originally Posted by 92SCtk View Post
    Would I be guessing correctly that you removed the line for the speed control vacuum, and routed the brake booster to that port on the tree? Having or not having cruise control is not really a concern for me, and that would be really simple/clean.
    Well, they used the same T for both baseline and SC Thunderbirds; all you have to do is remove the cap, and there's the factory tap for the vacuum brake booster.

    The cruise control is a different size hose anyway.

    (Pay careful attention: There's actually TWO T's made as one assembly; the very bottom, furthest from the mount, is for the windshield washer, and then there's the vacuum manifold, which isn't quite "T" shaped, closer to the mounting tab for the screw.)

    RwP

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Hamburg, PA
    Posts
    49
    Quote Originally Posted by RalphP View Post
    Well, they used the same T for both baseline and SC Thunderbirds; all you have to do is remove the cap, and there's the factory tap for the vacuum brake booster.

    The cruise control is a different size hose anyway.

    (Pay careful attention: There's actually TWO T's made as one assembly; the very bottom, furthest from the mount, is for the windshield washer, and then there's the vacuum manifold, which isn't quite "T" shaped, closer to the mounting tab for the screw.)

    RwP
    So I'm seeing what you're talking about on my 92, but not on my 91. Unless someone can tell me my 91 is routed incorrectly, the vacuum lines after the throttle body aren't the same. On my 91, the capped tap that you're talking about runs to the boost bypass valve because the inlet after the throttle body doesn't have the vacuum ports on the front side like the 92 and later years did. I'm following dthompson's thread, and, his being and 89, is why I'm assuming he ran a line over to the throttle body side. Below is what I'm talking about. The picture to the right of the supercharger is my 92. The picture to the left of the supercharger is my 91. On the later year cars, they routed the bypass to that front port. If it was a non-SC car, that tap wouldn't be going to a boost bypass anyway, but I see why they changed later on. For the time being, I'm going to route the "long" way. I'm not planning on this early year supercharger to remain on this car anyway, but that's a long way from here. I got the car to run and idle smooth, but I can't see what else it does without brakes.

    Name:  20170903_184412.jpg
Views: 30
Size:  109.2 KBName:  20170903_181024.jpg
Views: 30
Size:  80.3 KB
    1992 SC - 5 Speed, Black, Stock
    1991 SC - Auto, Black, Currently Stock

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Greenville, IN
    Posts
    4,220
    Quote Originally Posted by 92SCtk View Post
    Would I be guessing correctly that you removed the line for the speed control vacuum, and routed the brake booster to that port on the tree? Having or not having cruise control is not really a concern for me, and that would be really simple/clean.
    I think I removed the connection off the driver's side tee that was previously used for the boost control solenoid (a useless feature on only '89 SC's)
    Matt Haub
    Shootouts: '09 SS 1st | '10 Mod1 2nd | '11 Bracket 3rd | '12 Bracket 1st | 2013 | '14 Bracket 3rd | 2015 | '16 Bracket 1st & Mod2 2nd | 2017 |
    Black '89 5spd - 281K miles, MPx, E85, Alky-Inj RWHP: ? RWTQ: ? Best 1/4mi:12.521, MPH:107.23mph
    35th Anniversary Auto 46k miles | Red '93 Auto 186k miles
    My Garage

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Greenville, IN
    Posts
    4,220
    Here's a picture...

    Name:  P9170013_edit.jpg
Views: 25
Size:  88.0 KB
    Matt Haub
    Shootouts: '09 SS 1st | '10 Mod1 2nd | '11 Bracket 3rd | '12 Bracket 1st | 2013 | '14 Bracket 3rd | 2015 | '16 Bracket 1st & Mod2 2nd | 2017 |
    Black '89 5spd - 281K miles, MPx, E85, Alky-Inj RWHP: ? RWTQ: ? Best 1/4mi:12.521, MPH:107.23mph
    35th Anniversary Auto 46k miles | Red '93 Auto 186k miles
    My Garage

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Salem, OR
    Posts
    6,289
    Good place to hide used roach clips...cops will never think to look there

Similar Threads

  1. What tools are needed for head gasket swap?
    By superpoop in forum Technical Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-18-2016, 03:40 PM
  2. a few parts i need for my m90 swap...
    By novaspyder in forum Want to Buy
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-10-2005, 05:13 PM
  3. help!!! I need a vacuum diagram for an 89!!
    By lessonintorque in forum Technical Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-25-2003, 04:34 AM
  4. Source for Vacuum Bypass Actuator
    By Al T in forum Technical Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-07-2002, 11:46 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •