Super Coupe Club of America Forums  

Go Back   Super Coupe Club of America Forums > General SCCoA Forums > Racing/Track Results
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Garage Chat Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-22-2012, 04:50 PM
David Neibert's Avatar
David Neibert David Neibert is offline
SCCoA Admin
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: St. Charles, MO
Posts: 18,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by qc89SC View Post
you are on the stock injector? wish ill get similar numbers with my mpx clone!!! will have almost the same mods that you have on a freshly rebuilt engine
He has 80# injectors.

http://www.sccoa.com/forums/showpost...6&postcount=21

David
__________________
91 SC AOD 4.2..2.3 Whipple........10.92 @ 126.70
93 SC AOD 347 Turbo.................10.04 @ 138.99
My Garage
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-22-2012, 06:38 PM
Mike8675309's Avatar
Mike8675309 Mike8675309 is offline
SCCoA Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 13,052
Send a message via AIM to Mike8675309 Send a message via MSN to Mike8675309
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tedor View Post
Sweet, what duty cycle did you get with the 80lb injectors and 255lph pump? Maybe planning on running mine on E85 too
It is more a relation to the engine, and tune. I can tell you that on my motor, the 255lph high pressure pump and stock fuel lines are not enough for 80lb/hr injectors and E85. (I was at over 120% duty cycle due to lack of fuel pressure) Others may not see such an issue.
__________________
90 SC AOD
93 SC 5spd -441hp/462tq *SOLD*
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-22-2012, 06:51 PM
90blkbrd's Avatar
90blkbrd 90blkbrd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Altoona IA
Posts: 3,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike8675309 View Post
It is more a relation to the engine, and tune. I can tell you that on my motor, the 255lph high pressure pump and stock fuel lines are not enough for 80lb/hr injectors and E85. (I was at over 120% duty cycle due to lack of fuel pressure) Others may not see such an issue.
I forget what is that with or without methanol?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-23-2012, 08:25 AM
Tedor Tedor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike8675309 View Post
It is more a relation to the engine, and tune. I can tell you that on my motor, the 255lph high pressure pump and stock fuel lines are not enough for 80lb/hr injectors and E85. (I was at over 120% duty cycle due to lack of fuel pressure) Others may not see such an issue.
Yes I know, but you have more rwhp than him, just wonder what duty cycle he had on his setup and power.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-23-2012, 01:54 PM
92bird's Avatar
92bird 92bird is offline
SCCoA Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 1,179
Quote:
I can tell you that on my motor, the 255lph high pressure pump and stock fuel lines are not enough for 80lb/hr injectors and E85. (I was at over 120% duty cycle due to lack of fuel pressure) Others may not see such an issue.
Are you sure it was the lines and not the pump?

I wonder how you would have faired with an Aeromotive 340lph pump and stock lines? I know a proper tune on E85 is fuel hungry. My experience is not with SC's yet, but with GM 3.8L supercharged motors (GTP, Regal GS, etc). It requires about 30-35% more fuel at the same AFR as gas. But to make the best power, you need to be around .78 lambda (low 11's on a gasoline calibrated wideband), which eats up even more fuel. On a low boost or well intercooled setup you can go leaner, but on a high boost or non/under-intercooled setup, you gotta run it fat to see the biggest gains. Either way it won't knock, due to the octane, but leaner isn't necesssarily more power like gasoline. After all, the fuel is acting as your intercooler. I'm going to experiment with E100 on my GTP this year. Should be fun!

Jeramie
__________________
1994 Thunderbird SC Auto #2 - 45k original miles.
1994 Thunderbird SC Auto #1 - Police package heads/96 N/A motor test mule. SOLD
1992 Thunderbird SC 5 speed. Mostly stock now, former 345.5 rwhp/402.8 rwtq monster. - SOLD after 12 years of ownership
2000 Grand Prix GTP -Turbo conversion, billet precision 5858 CEA turbo .63 T3 hotside. Stock supercharged longblock with N/A top end, numbers coming soon.

Last edited by 92bird; 02-23-2012 at 01:59 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-23-2012, 03:09 PM
Mike8675309's Avatar
Mike8675309 Mike8675309 is offline
SCCoA Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 13,052
Send a message via AIM to Mike8675309 Send a message via MSN to Mike8675309
Quote:
Originally Posted by 92bird View Post
Are you sure it was the lines and not the pump?
When running on 92 octane pump gas, I only had done street tuning and didn't log fuel pressure or do a dyno run. But, I know that my wide band and data logging did not indicate an issue with high rpm, high boost runs with injectors duty or o2 levels. When I switched to E85, and tuned on the dyno, I found these issues.

Neither the pump nor the fuel lines were sufficient. I data log fuel pressure and with logged 12 v to the fuel pump (directly powered by the battery through a relay) , 19psi of manifold pressure at 5300 rpm (nearly 1000 rpm below my comfortable rpm point). In theory, that should give me 39+19 psi or 58psi at the rail for fuel pressure. What I actually saw was more like 36psi of fuel pressure at the rail. I verified the fuel pressure regulator was operating properly. (AFR got as high as 13.1"gas" though target was 11.2)

I will be cutting my old lines open when I replace them to look for any signs of problems that might explain the issues I had. Though in general I believe for my application, i need larger fuel lines. Work for the spring.
__________________
90 SC AOD
93 SC 5spd -441hp/462tq *SOLD*
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-24-2012, 07:19 PM
Super Duper Cou Super Duper Cou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver, Washington
Posts: 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tedor View Post
Sweet, what duty cycle did you get with the 80lb injectors and 255lph pump? Maybe planning on running mine on E85 too
I'm not sure what duty cycle the injectors are running at. I was wondering that too and forgot to ask him! My car is getting a little belt slip with the scp pulleys but I'm going to buy the 10rib magnum powers pulley set here real soon when I get my tax money back.

The track opens up here in the next couple of weeks. I can't wait to see what this thing can do.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-24-2012, 09:52 PM
92bird's Avatar
92bird 92bird is offline
SCCoA Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 1,179
Keep us updated bro. Excited to see your results.

That thing must be a tire fryer on the street!

Jeramie
__________________
1994 Thunderbird SC Auto #2 - 45k original miles.
1994 Thunderbird SC Auto #1 - Police package heads/96 N/A motor test mule. SOLD
1992 Thunderbird SC 5 speed. Mostly stock now, former 345.5 rwhp/402.8 rwtq monster. - SOLD after 12 years of ownership
2000 Grand Prix GTP -Turbo conversion, billet precision 5858 CEA turbo .63 T3 hotside. Stock supercharged longblock with N/A top end, numbers coming soon.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-25-2012, 12:53 AM
Super Duper Cou Super Duper Cou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver, Washington
Posts: 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by 92bird View Post
Keep us updated bro. Excited to see your results.

That thing must be a tire fryer on the street!

Jeramie
Thanks man, will do.

It burns the tires all the way through first gear and halfway through second on the street with 225 street tires! lol
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-06-2012, 08:26 AM
fturner fturner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Brantford, ON
Posts: 5,354
Send a message via MSN to fturner
By my calculations, running at 30% OD on the MPX, it is going to fall on its face at around 4200 rpm and become a huge heat pump and not move anymore air, and thats on a motor that can actually breath.

The rpm you saw the fall off at is to be expected because of the blower inlet plenum and the amount of back pressure the blower itself will be seeing right at the top, which would be in the neighbour hood of around 25psi or more with temperatures of 400+F, simply because the motor itself can't take the air the blower is putting out.

I don't think your car would do very well at the track because of traction issues with that much power down low, and the car falling over on its face because of heat etc.

Nice numbers though .

Fraser
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 03-07-2012, 01:43 AM
Super Duper Cou Super Duper Cou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver, Washington
Posts: 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by fturner View Post
By my calculations, running at 30% OD on the MPX, it is going to fall on its face at around 4200 rpm and become a huge heat pump and not move anymore air, and thats on a motor that can actually breath.

The rpm you saw the fall off at is to be expected because of the blower inlet plenum and the amount of back pressure the blower itself will be seeing right at the top, which would be in the neighbour hood of around 25psi or more with temperatures of 400+F, simply because the motor itself can't take the air the blower is putting out.

I don't think your car would do very well at the track because of traction issues with that much power down low, and the car falling over on its face because of heat etc.

Nice numbers though .

Fraser
Haha thanks man. We'll just have to wait and see I guess...

Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04-03-2012, 05:40 PM
JT's03's Avatar
JT's03 JT's03 is offline
SCCoA Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 437
Good numbers for an unopened engine. Have you had it back to the track yet?
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 04-03-2012, 10:25 PM
Super Duper Cou Super Duper Cou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver, Washington
Posts: 368
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT's03 View Post
Good numbers for an unopened engine. Have you had it back to the track yet?
I haven't had it at the track yet. I want to get some 10rib pulleys on my car before I take it back to the track because it's getting some belt slip with the pulleys i have on now. I'll be sure to post my track results on here when the time comes which is hopefully soon!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
347 Turbo SC dyno results David Neibert Non Technical Forum 30 09-19-2011 10:19 PM
Dyno Results - April 14th, 2007 SeanMatteson Super Coupe Club of Ontario 64 04-18-2007 11:15 PM
Todays Dyno Results - Not impressive Super XR7 Technical Forum 21 07-27-2004 10:07 PM
Dyno results are in. Ryan A Harris Super Coupe Club of Ontario 44 02-12-2003 01:18 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©1996 - 2012, Super Coupe Club of America, Inc.