![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
amazingly close...30,000 difference however...mazing though they cant even on a modified factory car get the brakes dead on!
__________________
1994 5 speed-Who needs a MAF anyways! 0 RWHP--0RWT 0 @ 0mph http://www.sccoa.com/forums/garage_v...vehicle&id=110 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
shelby: 30,000 dollars less...same 725 hp with 1.6 liters less engine....quicker in 1/4.....but that challenger looks mean...
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ford has sucked for years with their factory brakes. No suprise that the S/S is like that, my SHO is like that too. Hit the brakes late if you dare and if you do hold on and try to keep it going where you want it to go.
__________________
Later, Hock 92 SC 298rwhp/371rwtq Uses SC specific head studs from SCP with no problems! ![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Crazy stuff...
I think the mustang also won in the Supercharger Whine category. Very nice. ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Shelby Insider New's | Jim Demmitt Jr | Non Technical Forum | 40 | 06-06-2008 11:15 PM |
| Pulley and Snout Seal Replacement | rickbtbird | Technical Forum | 0 | 07-03-2005 02:58 AM |
| 67 Shelby GT500 (Eleanor) | ThunderDave | Non Technical Forum | 9 | 06-09-2004 01:45 AM |