Super Coupe Club of America Forums  

Go Back   Super Coupe Club of America Forums > General SCCoA Forums > Non Technical Forum
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Garage Chat Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-09-2007, 01:44 PM
XxSlowpokexX's Avatar
XxSlowpokexX XxSlowpokexX is offline
SCCoA Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 16,940
Send a message via AIM to XxSlowpokexX
S port vs MPII

Just curious. What if any are the advantages of the MPII over the S port?

I always figured the MPII was reated based on the S port because there was a lack of late model cases to be had....So is there a difference or an advantage of one over the other?

I'd perfer seat of teh pants or boost related differences then solely dyno related as different day different dyno can always be an issue


Thanks All

Damon
__________________
1994 5 speed-Who needs a MAF anyways!
0 RWHP--0RWT
0 @ 0mph
http://www.sccoa.com/forums/garage_v...vehicle&id=110
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardoa1 View Post
I love the filter. Its pimp. paper element and 10Mircron filtration, 12" long cause size matters.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-09-2007, 02:35 PM
ricardoa1's Avatar
ricardoa1 ricardoa1 is offline
SCCoA Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 6,841
It will be tough to find someone that has tested both on the same car, since they both perform similar. The inlet is the same size and the port is identical on an MPI or MPII. Aside from the back plate expoxied I dont see much bennefit for one over the other.
Now if you are talking about the magnuson S port, then the MPs should be a little better since that S port was designed with the stock inlet in mind. I think they only massaged the outlet but I could be wrong.
__________________
1994 Supercoupe 5spd Custom Modded. 2010 Shootout-Best Custom Award-415WHP off the bottle-12.2535 @112.18 off the bottle. Best HP to date 445whp Best TQ to date 516ft/lbs Modified with the 1% $$
1990 35th 5spd 2011 Carlisle 1st place class winner. 12.9@108MPH 1.9/60fts Modified with the 99% $$
2 SCs 12sec club member.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-09-2007, 02:39 PM
XxSlowpokexX's Avatar
XxSlowpokexX XxSlowpokexX is offline
SCCoA Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 16,940
Send a message via AIM to XxSlowpokexX
Inlets massaged on S port. I;m just not familiar with the MP blower products at all
__________________
1994 5 speed-Who needs a MAF anyways!
0 RWHP--0RWT
0 @ 0mph
http://www.sccoa.com/forums/garage_v...vehicle&id=110
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardoa1 View Post
I love the filter. Its pimp. paper element and 10Mircron filtration, 12" long cause size matters.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-09-2007, 03:13 PM
XR7 Dave's Avatar
XR7 Dave XR7 Dave is offline
SCCoA Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Madison, Ohio
Posts: 16,146
MPII has more porting on both inlet and outlet. The S-port is more effective at low OD, MPII will be better at higher OD's. If not overdriven enough the MPII will suffer slightly on the bottom end. High performance blowers are like high performance cams. Lowered seal timing means lower efficiency at lower rpms.
__________________
Email me here.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-09-2007, 03:18 PM
XxSlowpokexX's Avatar
XxSlowpokexX XxSlowpokexX is offline
SCCoA Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 16,940
Send a message via AIM to XxSlowpokexX
Hey Kenny I may need that 10% Jackshaft back..JK hehe
__________________
1994 5 speed-Who needs a MAF anyways!
0 RWHP--0RWT
0 @ 0mph
http://www.sccoa.com/forums/garage_v...vehicle&id=110
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardoa1 View Post
I love the filter. Its pimp. paper element and 10Mircron filtration, 12" long cause size matters.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-09-2007, 04:23 PM
Slysc Slysc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Milford, Michigan
Posts: 1,395
Send a message via AIM to Slysc
Damon,

Do you know anyone with a messed up S-port case?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-09-2007, 04:47 PM
Pablo94SC Pablo94SC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,906
Send a message via AIM to Pablo94SC
Quote:
Originally Posted by XR7 Dave View Post
MPII has more porting on both inlet and outlet. The S-port is more effective at low OD, MPII will be better at higher OD's. If not overdriven enough the MPII will suffer slightly on the bottom end. High performance blowers are like high performance cams. Lowered seal timing means lower efficiency at lower rpms.
Do you mean that the rotor timing was changed due to the revised inlet port design on the MPII so that it can handle higher RPM? Do you have a recommended OD range that the MPII seems to perform best at? What would you say the maximum blower RPM of the MPII is? Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-09-2007, 04:48 PM
Pablo94SC Pablo94SC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,906
Send a message via AIM to Pablo94SC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slysc View Post
Damon,

Do you know anyone with a messed up S-port case?

I have my late mode case with the window in it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-09-2007, 04:51 PM
Slysc Slysc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Milford, Michigan
Posts: 1,395
Send a message via AIM to Slysc
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pablo94SC View Post
Do you mean that the rotor timing was changed due to the revised inlet port design on the MPII so that it can handle higher RPM? Do you have a recommended OD range that the MPII seems to perform best at? What would you say the maximum blower RPM of the MPII is? Thanks.
No, I think what he means is that the duration of the overlap where the rotor seals to the case is reduced so at lower rpms you get less efficiency but at higher RPMs the larger inlet and outlet flow better.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-09-2007, 04:52 PM
Slysc Slysc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Milford, Michigan
Posts: 1,395
Send a message via AIM to Slysc
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pablo94SC View Post
I have my late mode case with the window in it.
That's the one Are you going to make a planter out if it or can I do some experimenting with it?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-09-2007, 04:59 PM
Pablo94SC Pablo94SC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,906
Send a message via AIM to Pablo94SC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slysc View Post
That's the one Are you going to make a planter out if it or can I do some experimenting with it?
Experiment away... but if it's good, I might want it back. I'll ship it back to ya in the box the heads come in. Need the rotor pack and snout too? I might use my old rotors and snout in the early model case I have here.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-09-2007, 05:01 PM
Pablo94SC Pablo94SC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,906
Send a message via AIM to Pablo94SC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slysc View Post
No, I think what he means is that the duration of the overlap where the rotor seals to the case is reduced so at lower rpms you get less efficiency but at higher RPMs the larger inlet and outlet flow better.
Gotcha. Then it's not really about OD as much as blower RPM. That's good news for those willing to run the engine at higher RPM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-09-2007, 05:45 PM
XxSlowpokexX's Avatar
XxSlowpokexX XxSlowpokexX is offline
SCCoA Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 16,940
Send a message via AIM to XxSlowpokexX
But at Higher RPM's I would assume you would need the blower to spin that much faster to compensate for airflow. So just revving the blower higher wont help. Needs to be OD'd

probably why my DIII performed so well
__________________
1994 5 speed-Who needs a MAF anyways!
0 RWHP--0RWT
0 @ 0mph
http://www.sccoa.com/forums/garage_v...vehicle&id=110
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardoa1 View Post
I love the filter. Its pimp. paper element and 10Mircron filtration, 12" long cause size matters.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-09-2007, 05:52 PM
tim tim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,807
I weent from a 13.9 at the shoot out in 2006 to a 12.52 in 2007. Big secret get big enuogh injectors to suport it. Drive it 20% and holy hole shot bat man! Ask the people that were at the shootout!!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-10-2007, 11:42 AM
Pablo94SC Pablo94SC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 1,906
Send a message via AIM to Pablo94SC
My only problem Tim is I need to keep the torque around 420lbs or less in order to benefit from lock-up at WOT. Otherwise I'll burn up the TC's clutch. Maybe I'll go with the 15% OD setup from MP and see what happens.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A New Cylinder Head for the SC. XR7 Dave New Products and Services 150 05-22-2013 02:48 AM
MPII supercharger and MPII plenum for sale superbirdx Parts for Sale 13 09-14-2007 05:03 AM
rebuild procedes... exhaust port sbest Super Coupe Club of Ontario 2 03-16-2002 03:23 AM
The blower debate thickens with the Magnaport II for 89-93's Wayne Ing Super Coupe Club of Ontario 21 02-13-2002 02:56 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©1996 - 2012, Super Coupe Club of America, Inc.