Super Coupe Club of America Forums  

Go Back   Super Coupe Club of America Forums > General SCCoA Forums > Non Technical Forum
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Garage Chat Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-07-2008, 11:51 PM
Burbank95sc's Avatar
Burbank95sc Burbank95sc is offline
32 valve SC
SCCoA Member #: 1782
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Romeoville, IL
Posts: 809
3.8 L with 2.3 Whipple blower

Here is the VIDEO link of a GTP with 2.3 Whipple blower,it makes nice #.What ever happened to that project with Whipple blower on a super coupe that I saw way back.I don't see why SC wouldn't pull around 600hp with blower like that.


Here is the post from a shop that is working on this car.

We are shooting for over 600 WHP with 28 PSI this spring on this car. It is a daily driver, with full interior and custom leather. It will be getting a custom built roll cage this spring to meet NHRA requirements. It will be at the POCI Event at Barona Dragway in El Cajon, CA 2/16-2/17 if you want to see it in person. It will be the first time to a track since the Whipple went on last spring.

There are several turbo conversion GP's that are pushing over 600 WHP (one twin turbo over 800 WHP on a factory bottom end). The 3800 Series II/III is probably one of the best built engines ever produced, it is a shame GM has canned it.
__________________
95 SC - 4.6 DOHC,4R70W -sold
96 GT - Terminator powered,6 speed ,2.2 KB -590/565
01 F-150 - work beater
94 LX - 4.6 SOHC - gone
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-2008, 12:07 AM
XxSlowpokexX's Avatar
XxSlowpokexX XxSlowpokexX is offline
Where quality is job 1!
SCCoA Member #: 2007
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 14,353
Send a message via AIM to XxSlowpokexX
There is no reason. The 2.3 whipple is still around. I'm sure with more boost we will get there but noone as of yet has run that much boost out of their AR's or the 2.3 whipple when it was running. I'm sure it will change soon enough

Quote:
The 3800 Series II/III is probably one of the best built engines ever produced, it is a shame GM has canned it.
...errrrr
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TinManSC92 View Post
How much faster are you looking at making these things to go?? I can hardly make it over a sidewalk now.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2008, 01:48 PM
92bird's Avatar
92bird 92bird is offline
10+ year SC Owner!
SCCoA Member #: 1200
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 830
Quote:
...errrrr
What does that mean?
__________________
1992 Thunderbird SC 5 speed. Mostly stock now, former 345.5 rwhp/402.8 rwtq monster.
1994 Thunderbird SC Auto - The ugly duckling.
1996 Thunderbird LX 3.8l, parts car.
2000 Grand Prix GTP Gen V SC swap, headers, rockers, 3.5" pulley, tuned on E-85.
2000 Grand Prix GT, the "Fiance's" car. Needs boost
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-08-2008, 02:20 PM
XxSlowpokexX's Avatar
XxSlowpokexX XxSlowpokexX is offline
Where quality is job 1!
SCCoA Member #: 2007
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 14,353
Send a message via AIM to XxSlowpokexX
Err means I was never really impressed
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TinManSC92 View Post
How much faster are you looking at making these things to go?? I can hardly make it over a sidewalk now.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-08-2008, 03:17 PM
nickleman60's Avatar
nickleman60 nickleman60 is online now
MPx + NO2 = 11 seconds
SCCoA Member #: 2406
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: va beach,va
Posts: 4,475
Doesn't Super XR7 have a 2.4 AR on his ride?
__________________
'94 SC AUTO - Black Bird......11.943 @ 114.63
'94 SC AUTO - Opal Frost......Daily Driver
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-08-2008, 03:49 PM
92bird's Avatar
92bird 92bird is offline
10+ year SC Owner!
SCCoA Member #: 1200
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 830
Quote:
Err means I was never really impressed
I know what you meant, I was just trying to get a rile outta ya. hehe..

I thought that too until I got involved in the GTP community. We have a GTP member in Colorado running 11's (at mile high) on a stock longblock with over 200k miles and some rediculous amount of nitrous. (250 shot I believe).. Only mods are a Gen V blower, 2.8 pulley, 1.9 rockers and full exhaust.

He manages a pizza hut and delivers in his car all year long.

I'm really surprized the modified 3800's don't have problems. They have teeny weeny piston ring lands and no intercooler, yet they manage to survive. I think a lot of it has to do with the advanced knock sensor controls, and knock retard function in the PCM.

My daily driver is a 2000 GTP. It runs 14.8 at mile high on a stock pulley ( about 5 psi boost), 1.9 rockers, 2.5" downpipe, DHP tuner, and cold air intake. I'm still a Ford fan, and won't do too much more to the GTP. But I have to admit its been dead nuts reliable for the past 2 years and 30k miles I've had it (total mileage 108k now).. Its also a hoot to drive around town. Just wish the gears weren't so tall 1-2 shift at 61mph and 2-3 shift at 97mph with performance shift on.

Just my .02
__________________
1992 Thunderbird SC 5 speed. Mostly stock now, former 345.5 rwhp/402.8 rwtq monster.
1994 Thunderbird SC Auto - The ugly duckling.
1996 Thunderbird LX 3.8l, parts car.
2000 Grand Prix GTP Gen V SC swap, headers, rockers, 3.5" pulley, tuned on E-85.
2000 Grand Prix GT, the "Fiance's" car. Needs boost

Last edited by 92bird; 02-08-2008 at 03:53 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-08-2008, 04:37 PM
ricardoa1's Avatar
ricardoa1 ricardoa1 is offline
SC Newbie
SCCoA Member #: 2062
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 5,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by 92bird View Post
I'm really surprized the modified 3800's don't have problems. They have teeny weeny piston ring lands and no intercooler, yet they manage to survive. I think a lot of it has to do with the advanced knock sensor controls, and knock retard function in the PCM.

Just my .02
Thats the only reason my 400whp Neon has survived 30k miles with no problem. If the SC had a knock sensor like that you would see alot more still running. But the GM 3.8L is not as good as the SC 3.8L the heads dont flow as well.
__________________
94' Manual
Garage Link

2006 MazdaSpeed 6, AWD Turbo 6spd. New Daily driver, built on Ford's CD3 platform. Another Ford I must be crazy....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-08-2008, 05:17 PM
superdadsc superdadsc is offline
SC Newbie
SCCoA Member #: 3228
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: largo fla
Posts: 877
Engine Management

Is there an aftermarket engine mgt. kit that has these features that you are talking about, one that might increase durability and performance from a higher tech unit? Just wondering
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-08-2008, 07:06 PM
92bird's Avatar
92bird 92bird is offline
10+ year SC Owner!
SCCoA Member #: 1200
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 830
Quote:
But the GM 3.8L is not as good as the SC 3.8L the heads dont flow as well.
Not true.

Here's the following info for both heads, at 28" of water and .500 valve lift.

Stock series II 3800 GM heads: 186 cfm intake and 148 cfm exhaust

Stock 89-95 SC heads: 165 cfm intake and 120 cfm exhaust

For comparison, my stock valve size, ported DR FRED stage I heads flow about 190 cfm intake and 160 cfm exhaust.

stock GM heads > stock SC heads

Also, GM cams tend to be a little healthier. My GTP shift points are set around 6,000 rpm with the stock cam, and it pulls pretty hard all the way up there.

My GTP made the below dyno numbers before any mods, except a basic PCM tune and cold air intake, on only 5 psi boost.

Not doggin' the SC, I own one, and have for nearly 10 yrs. Its just that stock for stock, the GM SC 3.8L is a better performer out of the box, but I believe with the right mods and the ability to fully tune, the SC has more potential.

Jeramie
__________________
1992 Thunderbird SC 5 speed. Mostly stock now, former 345.5 rwhp/402.8 rwtq monster.
1994 Thunderbird SC Auto - The ugly duckling.
1996 Thunderbird LX 3.8l, parts car.
2000 Grand Prix GTP Gen V SC swap, headers, rockers, 3.5" pulley, tuned on E-85.
2000 Grand Prix GT, the "Fiance's" car. Needs boost

Last edited by 92bird; 02-08-2008 at 07:15 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-08-2008, 07:41 PM
ricardoa1's Avatar
ricardoa1 ricardoa1 is offline
SC Newbie
SCCoA Member #: 2062
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 5,214
How much do they flow ported?
__________________
94' Manual
Garage Link

2006 MazdaSpeed 6, AWD Turbo 6spd. New Daily driver, built on Ford's CD3 platform. Another Ford I must be crazy....
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-08-2008, 10:32 PM
MediumD MediumD is offline
SC Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by 92bird View Post
Its just that stock for stock, the GM SC 3.8L is a better performer out of the box,
Yep. It's just a shame GM handicapped it with FWD.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-08-2008, 11:06 PM
92bird's Avatar
92bird 92bird is offline
10+ year SC Owner!
SCCoA Member #: 1200
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 830
Quote:
How much do they flow ported?
Intense stage 4 heads flow 224 intake and 212 exhaust with slightly larger valves.

To compare, I believe welded-port Steigemeier heads flow around 214 intake and 210 exhaust (going by memory, may be off slightly).

But, the SC has the advantage of aluminum heads, better heat dissapation = more timing before knock.

GM heads are cast iron. Heavy, old tech stuff, but solid as nails.

The series III 3800 S/C got an Eaton gen V blower, better connecting rods, throttle by wire, enhanced tq managment, and a slightly larger exhaust valve (2004+ GTP)
__________________
1992 Thunderbird SC 5 speed. Mostly stock now, former 345.5 rwhp/402.8 rwtq monster.
1994 Thunderbird SC Auto - The ugly duckling.
1996 Thunderbird LX 3.8l, parts car.
2000 Grand Prix GTP Gen V SC swap, headers, rockers, 3.5" pulley, tuned on E-85.
2000 Grand Prix GT, the "Fiance's" car. Needs boost
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-08-2008, 11:48 PM
CMac89's Avatar
CMac89 CMac89 is offline
No whining--only BOOSSHHT
SCCoA Member #: 3429
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Indy
Posts: 4,463
Send a message via AIM to CMac89 Send a message via MSN to CMac89 Send a message via Yahoo to CMac89
SC heads will flow 230-240cfm depending on port job. Exhaust flow isn't worth talkin about.

Aluminum heads make less power than a cast iron head will. The less timing a motor has to run to make maximum horsepower, the more efficient it is. An aluminum head uses more timing to increase the duration of time fuel burns inside of a cylinder, which is determined by heat. It takes energy to dissipate heat, which costs HP.

A cast iron head doesn't need very much timing to create the heat required in a cylinder to burn fuel. It doesn't have a constant flux in cylinder temperatures that an aluminum head does. That takes energy as well.

Also, an aluminum cylinder head creates hot spots, which also means there has to be a cold spot, on the combustion chamber. The hot spots create decomposition of hydrocarbons inside of a fuel. Heat separates least dense molecules (hydrogen) exposing them as free radicals, which combust by pressure alone. Combustion of a free radical causes auto ignition inside of a cylinder, meaning the fuel is ignited before spark occurs, which causes detonation.

Knock isn't a violent function. It is a wave front across the top of a piston that causes slight agitation from turbulence. Knock happens before detonation, but if it's present alone, it won't result in damage.

Last edited by CMac89; 02-08-2008 at 11:51 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-09-2008, 12:03 AM
XxSlowpokexX's Avatar
XxSlowpokexX XxSlowpokexX is offline
Where quality is job 1!
SCCoA Member #: 2007
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 14,353
Send a message via AIM to XxSlowpokexX
Casey. Both iron and aluminum heads will provide "hot spots" especially where there is casting flash or thin ridges. Now how would an aluminum head work compared to an iron head with both having thermal coatings used. The heat of combustion should be retained in both and hot spots eliminated in the combustion chamber.

About 3.8vs3.8 heads

I knew someone years ago that flowed GN heads and SC heads on the same flowbech and the SC heads had flowed better. Are the later model 3800 heads better? I dont recall the flow numbers anything. It was a long time ago
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TinManSC92 View Post
How much faster are you looking at making these things to go?? I can hardly make it over a sidewalk now.

Last edited by XxSlowpokexX; 02-09-2008 at 12:59 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-09-2008, 12:30 AM
CMac89's Avatar
CMac89 CMac89 is offline
No whining--only BOOSSHHT
SCCoA Member #: 3429
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Indy
Posts: 4,463
Send a message via AIM to CMac89 Send a message via MSN to CMac89 Send a message via Yahoo to CMac89
They do both create hot spots, but it's splitting hairs. Aluminum will output significant effects of the hot spots quite significantly before cast iron will.

I've tried every thermal coating, they don't work with anything I've run. They haven't changed the amount of timing run. They may help severe hot spots, but they don't heat up a cold spot.

With an angle plug head, the hot side of the combustion chamber is the exhaust valve side. Radicals diffuse to cold spot (intake valve) areas which, again, create combustion by pressures exerted on the radical before spark occurs.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intermittent problem - Climate Control blower fan kendall221 Technical Forum 7 07-10-2007 07:37 PM
Blower porting and re-build services. Other kits will be shown for their 1st time! victor malvar New Products and Services 8 05-02-2007 09:25 PM
RUMORS on this board about the mighty SC... dirtybird91 Non Technical Forum 175 12-22-2003 06:04 AM
expalnation of perverted blower mannysc Super Coupe Club of Southern California 17 05-24-2002 04:51 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1996 - 2010, Super Coupe Club of America, Inc.