SVO Thunderbird

Toms-SC

Registered User
With photos of the build on Facebook I figured it would be a good time to bring some context onto the forum. There are some exciting builds going on out there, bring to the SCCoA and post em up. This thread will be a mix of SVO facts and my build which is still unfolding.

Back in late 2010 I was in a bit of a decision spot with my SC. Wait for a 2.0 A/R kit and upgrade my long block to handle the power or try something different. How about a 4.5 SVO V6? Speaking with Super Coupes Unlimited it was determined it was possible. Needing to learn more about it involved finding and buying any vintage print material that floated around on eBay. The old magazines and books were extremely beneficial as the SVO program had a significant change in 1991. Parts came and went, part numbers changed, some never even made it production even though they were published in the catalog. The book published by Dave Emanuel in 1992 about the engine had vitals such as clearance and torque specs. Lots of big names worked on the SVO program, it was neat developing a history of the program from scratch.

noY8Z.jpg


The theme of my car has always been street first, track second. This build is no different. I don't have access to all-star mechanics up here, nor do I have a truck and a trailer. The Thunderbird would have to get to the track under its own power and back. The closest track is 3 hours away. In order for this to happen a early style SVO block with matching cylinder heads and an even fire crank shaft were required. Yea yea, insert jokes about my lifters and street camshaft now.

Of course sticking with the typical pain the the ~~~ hard to find SuperCoupe parts thing, the SVO versions of the cylinder heads and block we wanted for this build were only produced in 1989-1991 and were nearly impossible to find. As of this time I only know of one other early block out there but it has been semi filled with concrete. The canted valve cylinder heads feature a coolant cross over, support rocker hardware, clear the stock hood, and have reasonable sized ports. The hunt for parts took a very long time but in early 2011 they were safe at SCU's shop.

WlQZj.jpg

Y4F9c.jpg


The short form history of the SVO program is:
- Ran in the NASCAR Busch series. Competing against the Buick V6 Stage II parts
- Parts were produced from 1989-1995 and during that period
- Had four versions of cylinder heads based off of two different castings. (Early canted valve produced by Cosworth/Late style inline valve produced by Brodix)
- Two versions of cylinder blocks based off of one casting. (Matched to cylinder head style. Produced in the same plant as our 3.8 block in Ontario, Canada)
- Four versions of crank shafts based off of an even-fire and off-fire configuration. (Even fire, odd fire produced by Bryant)
- Four intake manifold versions based off of two different castings. (Matched to cylinder head style. Unsure who produced it.)

My street build posed some unique challenges, never minding its a unicorn motor to begin with. The engine was designed to run 8,500 - 9,500 RPM's, dry sump. The off the shelf parts reflect that. The connecting rods are long, the pistons are flat top, the camshafts are rough ground with a 104 LSA, etc. Adding to the challenge is that canted valve parts are not entirely interchangeable with the later year inline valve cylinder heads. Just an example of issues we had to deal with was incorrect hand inscribed part numbers, minor revisions of parts through out the program (Spark-plug placement, exhaust port shapes) vendors messing up on orders and so on. I've visited SCU twice checking up on progress and brainstorming. I can't thank SCU enough. I suspect other shops would have scoffed at the idea or f-ed up the build royally.

The stats:
- Wet sump Stef's oil pan
- NOS even fire crank shaft
- 4.5L displacement, 8.5 compression
- Ported NOS canted valve heads (298 in, 227 ex flow @ 600. 2.125/1.710 valves)
- Fully custom billet hydraulic roller cam. (Ground to a common SC profile)
- Carillo custom 6.350 connecting rods
- Wiseco custom pistons with ceramic heat barrier top coating and moly graphite skirt protection
- COMP Cams Ultra Pro Magnum XD Roller Rocker Arms
- Hydrolic lifters with solid roller springs, some trick stuff that SCU came up with
- Block modified to accept hydrolic lifter system
- A mixed up set up ARP head studs.I guess you could call them semi~custom.
- Modified NOS single plane intake manifold with a Edelbrock intake elbow (should clear the stock hood)
- Steel shim head gasket

Where the build is headed:
- The engine is to be fed with a Procharger
- Engine management is going to be the EEC-IV with Quarterhorse
- Reuse the unlocking AOD
- Upgrade the fuel system to feed it all
- Refresh the rearend
- Redo the exhaust system
- Full working A/C system :D

The unknowns:
- Intercooler and radiator design. The Procharger discharges to the front of the car. Procharger offered a a kit for the V6 Mustang that we've poached key parts from but we want to avoid using the plastic discharge hat. I'm completely open to the idea of going for a custom intercooler design.

Dry mock. The hallow long block assembled and dropped into a Thunderbird K-member. Note that the accessories brackets and pro charger bracket bolt up and sits on factory motor mounts.
uofD6ln.jpg


Stock as cast SVO vs SC cylinder head
Jdlsi.jpg


Ported SVO vs ported SC cylinder head
J2R4ebw.jpg

Xd52P6c.jpg

tOJPEOl.jpg


The valve sizes speak for themselves. Stock on the left, typical ported SC head valves in the middle, SVO on the right.
NX6Bj00.jpg


Intake manifold and elbow, pre-modification.
95j5hja.jpg


This is what a $800 camshaft and $300 cam gear looks like. Comp coated the cam in unicorns blood for ultra strength yet flexibility in the areas required. It's been ground to a common super coupe specification which I do not know the details of nor do I care.
KmPJe3t.jpg


The crankshaft was made by Bryant and is no bull. Once compared with a 4.2 crank is becomes easy to notice the attention to details in the Bryant crank. Weight reduction and increased oil passages are the first things I noticed.
LcqEcH1.jpg


Custom lifter retainer system. By maching the block and designing the retainer system the block can now accept off the shelf hydrolic roller lifters.
8vWEk4T.jpg


Short block assembled. A major milestone in the project.
k76yX2A.jpg


Cylinder heads completed, valve train installed.
l1F3e1a.jpg
 
Last edited:
Tom,

Cool project. What kind of RPMs are you expecting to turn with the hydraulic roller cam ? I would have thought you could use some link bar hydraulic roller lifters like I'm using in the 5.0 based Dart block in my 93 SC. Did all of the lifter retainers have to be reworked from the figure "8" style to the fork style to accommodate a wider lifter bore spacing or was there some other reason for doing that ? I guess you will also be adding injector bungs to the intake manifold since the heads don't have any provisions for the injectors. Love that oil pan !

David
 
Very nice Tom. What I love about threads like this is the whole uncharted areas people take their builds. Just when you think you have done something diffrent in the community, someone comes along with the better mouse trap. My hats off to you and Casey with these rare engine builds and look forward to the final outcome.


Ken
 
This is what a $800 camshaft and $300 cam gear looks like. Comp coated the cam in unicorns blood for ultra strength yet flexibility in the areas required. It's been ground to a common super coupe specification which I do not know the details of nor do I care.

Why would you not care about the cam specs?:confused:Its the heart of the engine. Guess you would have to tell us is this a street only car, weekend race car or full out bad ~~~ race car. If the engine could turn 8 grand or more Im sure the cam would have to be spec to perform. If your building a mild engine, I would assume you could have saved a bundle just building a 3.8. Guess Im just a little confused on what the final product is expected to do performance wise

Ken
 
Why would you not care about the cam specs?:confused:Its the heart of the engine. Guess you would have to tell us is this a street only car, weekend race car or full out bad ~~~ race car. If the engine could turn 8 grand or more Im sure the cam would have to be spec to perform. If your building a mild engine, I would assume you could have saved a bundle just building a 3.8. Guess Im just a little confused on what the final product is expected to do performance wise

Ken

I was hoping somebody would call me out on this. It's a street car primarily. I never asked exact specifications as I have full faith in SCU's ability to translate my requirements into cam specs. All I know is that its got a 112 LSA.

Price wise, when it's all said and done I figure I'd have paid a $2,000-> $3,000 premium over a fully built 3.8/4.2 (assuming you were starting both from scratch). This community as a whole has been focusing on two performance trends since 2008; A) larger forced induction B) more boost. The unfortunate part is that key reliability issues go unresolved, lifting heads as an example. So...that extra money gets me superior heads, additional displacement, a better flowing intake manifold, and addresses weaknesses in the production 3.8/4.2. Big win in my opinion. While it may sound silly to attempt to 'de-tune' a race engine I find it just as silly to attempt to get 800 HP out of a production engine. How many times are you going to make that 800 HP? It's the glass cannon effect. The final product should be in the range of a reliable 500-700HP. Could it make more? Yes. Do I want more? No. I'll let the hardcore's like Kevin and Casey (and whomever buys my spare parts) explore the performance limits of the SVO engine.
 
Tom,

Cool project. What kind of RPMs are you expecting to turn with the hydraulic roller cam ? I would have thought you could use some link bar hydraulic roller lifters like I'm using in the 5.0 based Dart block in my 93 SC. Did all of the lifter retainers have to be reworked from the figure "8" style to the fork style to accommodate a wider lifter bore spacing or was there some other reason for doing that ? I guess you will also be adding injector bungs to the intake manifold since the heads don't have any provisions for the injectors. Love that oil pan !

David

It's not for sure but I'm expecting it to go to 7000 RPM , possibly more. The engine will want to continue to breath but I can't envision myself running around with a 8500 RPM car on the street. The lifter bores on the SVO block are wider than the 5.0 dart, the lifters were binding within the link bars. I ended up paying about the same as a set of custom lifters but now the block will accept off the shelf units which to me is completely worth it. You are correct, the intake manifold is being modified now to accept fuel injectors. The elbow and intake manifold need to be completed before I can send them out for powder coating.
 
It's not for sure but I'm expecting it to go to 7000 RPM , possibly more. The engine will want to continue to breath but I can't envision myself running around with a 8500 RPM car on the street. The lifter bores on the SVO block are wider than the 5.0 dart, the lifters were binding within the link bars. I ended up paying about the same as a set of custom lifters but now the block will accept off the shelf units which to me is completely worth it. You are correct, the intake manifold is being modified now to accept fuel injectors. The elbow and intake manifold need to be completed before I can send them out for powder coating.

Tom,

I'm sure the cam specifications, hydraulic lifters and spring package are going to dictate the rpm you can turn without bouncing or floating the valves. If Dave used a cam profile similar to what he specified for my motor, I would expect it to rev to around 7000. With the centrifugal blower, that's also where it's likely to make peak horse power.

I think the bare aluminum intake and elbow will look better than powder coated. Same with the valve covers and oil pan.

David
 
Thanks for posting this. I was aware of your build, but wondered what had happened, as everything was very quiet - no news for a while. The pictures are great.

I am quite fascinated with the 4.5L SVO V6, though I know my finances will not allow it for years, and realistically not ever. My more rational side tells me that it's just not needed for the street. My fun-loving side, however, wants to drop the hammer on it.

You (and Dave) certainly did have your work cut out for you, with the rarity of these parts and the confusing variety of versions that were produced. It sounds like you have selected the best options.

I would like to see a turbo setup or even a Roots blower over the centrifugal, but I understand completely that getting it working now is a goal unto itself.

Very exciting project!
 
Tom,

I think the bare aluminum intake and elbow will look better than powder coated. Same with the valve covers and oil pan.

David

I'm not a big fan of how the Edelbrock elbow and intake manifold look right now. I'm expecting that all unused bungs, mating surfaces will be machined off so it looks a little more professional. Afterward it'll go out for powder coating, maybe with the throttle body too. When it comes to the valve covers I'm a big fan of what Corey did so I'll be doing exactly that. The fuel rails will most likely go out for anodizing. Never thought of doing something with the oil pan. Hmm....
 
Last edited:
Thanks for posting this. I was aware of your build, but wondered what had happened, as everything was very quiet - no news for a while. The pictures are great.

I would like to see a turbo setup or even a Roots blower over the centrifugal, but I understand completely that getting it working now is a goal unto itself.

I was very hesitant for many years to put something up in public about it. If something critical went wrong I didn't want to have the title of failure floating around. I could have just eaten my losses and move on.

The original plan called for a roots blower. What killed it was funding. Dropping money on a serious CnC intake manifold is mega dollars and is too rich for my blood. Through some luck I scored parts from a Procharger Mustang V6 kit for cheap. It was worth the gamble, it bolts up.
 
Looks great! On a related note, does anyone get the impression that, perhaps, the SC's kind of slip under the radar (other than for the more knowledgeable performance car guy), because they weren't SVO related?
 
There is nothing wrong with a 557inch big block in a S.C. Heck what will they say if I add a couple tubro's to one... or a racr pro charger????........Rich

Wrong Rich, I was referring to Rich Thompson. The fellow who set the mark for determining resale value of a modified SC. :D
 
Is Rich Thompson the guy who re-did every nut and bolt and sold it dirt cheap to Ira, but when Ira got it turns out the motor was blown up ?
 
Back
Top